“Lord, I’m going to get in trouble over this, but it is not natural for two women or two men to be married. If it was natural, they would have the equipment to have a sexual relationship.”
If that wasn’t enough, Everhart goes on to warn against the abuse that she says would be sure to follow:
“You may be as straight as an arrow, and you may have a friend that is as straight as an arrow. Say you had a great job with the government where you had this wonderful health plan. I mean, what would prohibit you from saying that you’re gay, and y’all get married and still live as separate, but you get all the benefits? I just see so much abuse in this it’s unreal. I believe a husband and a wife should be a man and a woman, the benefits should be for a man and a woman. There is no way that this is about equality. To me, it’s all about a free ride.”
In other words, no to same-sex marriage because “straight as an arrow” heterosexual singles wouldn’t be able to resist all the perks of coupledom and pretend to be gay in order to get married and benefit. In that case why not abandon marriage all together? I mean what about the men and women who marry for money? Aren’t those heterosexuals just looking for a free ridetoo?
Well, Everhart she seems to have (maybe inadvertently) suggested just that in response to a question on parenting and gay marriage.
“[But] if I had a next door neighbor who was in a gay relationship, I could be just as friendly to them as I could be to you and your wife or anybody else. I’m not saying that we ostracize them or anything like that. I’m just saying I’m against marriage because once you get the gay marriage you get everything else.”
Watch Jonathan Capehart, Angela Rye and John Hopkins’ Todd Shepard discuss how Dr. Ben Carson explains his way out of controversial anti-gay remarks, using a fruit basket reference: